Saturday, January 24, 2009

The Online Protection Act

Anti-porn online law dies quietly in Supreme Court-1-21-09-Mark Sherman-Associated Press

       " Washington-A federal law intended to restrict children's access to Internet pornography died quietly Wednesday at the Supreme Court, more than 10 years after 'CONGRESS' overwhelmingly approved it."
        " The child Online Protection Act would have barred Web sites from making harmful content available to minors over the Internet. The law had been embroiled in challenges to its constitutionality since it passed in 1998 and never took effect."
 
         Lets all bow our heads...AND GIV"A THANKS TO ALL GODS SERVANTS!! MAY GOD'A BLESS ALL THE LAU'YERS WHO PROTECT OUR NATION'S PEDOPHILES! HALLELUJAH! 

         Well, one can only hope it doesn't go back to the States. I do hope the GOOD lawyers try again. Since when did 2 year olds, 5 year olds or 8 year olds for example, have full individual rights? If they commit, say capital murder, why not treat them as adults in the court systems? After all, there're individuals. With rights. Who needs parents?
         The only thing that really comes to mind is sexual grooming. But within that context, what might they see? And with whom? If the courts feel that filters might do a better job than any existing law, or new one. Who controls the on/off switch to the filter? If we are all individuals and equal, who plays the role of the adult? The Supreme Court didn't.

No comments: