THE ANONYMITY OF VOICE IS ' NU '; WHERE'S MOMMY ? The photo is one of a film which exhibits ' desirable behavioural responses ' that work on several levels, when first observed, mirrored by today's Titans in response to all parents desires, or do they? When I first saw this movie jacket, it was by accident, a child, a little girl to be precise, was wandering by, plucking the railing, shelving as Tom Sawyer would of a stick on a picket fence. I saw her coming and I moved back and allowed passage for the child, who was lost in her own making, a world of no concerns or worry; just innocent fun. She was five, maybe six.
As she passed, I noticed this video, DVD, within her reach, though she did not see, hopefully. I was disgusted at first sight of the ' youngster ( ? ) ' being advertised in the billing; beneath the sleeve of the video jacket. What immediately came to mind was "-------don't excite daddy," a bad memory of an event, not of my families history, but another family of whom I no longer know or associate with. The face the child on the NAMBLA site hit me in unison also, a flurry of disgust, a remembrance of what one flushes daily. ( Something that I'm currently putting up with, with my landlord right now, a third world situation. We'll see if this repair of the pluming and bathroom, the old record, at the time I worked for ARCA ( Healthcare and Homes for the Mentally Ill and Handicapped ). A month and a half taking showers atop a milk crate, and taking care of business where ever, and going to class everyday. And in the end reporting Abuse done to a handicapped person, a relative of a ' Cop 'as seen by the photo on his dresser, and getting fired for it. My boss was one smart lady, the abuser too. Affirmative action works, go figure. That water was dark, at least ' this ' water, more or less, clear. ) And just F..K'EN WRONG. All around, just a world of shit!
Though the impact ( the DVD jacket ) was emotional, at first, it is not the most important expression of the initial response, then actions and thought process taken. First I asked that the video be moved to a new location that is out of sight of young eyes, and gave my accounting of how I came upon the video in the first place. The employee of the rental establishment in my neighborhood, a common meeting ground of young and old alike in an atmosphere of learning and entertainment. He blushed when I pointed out the video and low and behold, a young girl lopes on by in particle skip, giving the shelving plucks of given tune only she can hear.
If you stop and think about the display of a young male in' spoon ' with another male, who seems about, at least one year younger than the male to the right, and the same for the male facing the young male at center, to the left. Then would that make it any better? Secondly, would the title come into play as it consists of two words, ' HOUSE ' and then ' BOY ?' Lets examine ' HOUSE. ' Structure. Where people live as animals. ( Yet some animals seek shelter, thus structure. ) A place where you live, a place where you eat and sleep. Lets examine, or more properly define ' BOY,' a young man, not a girl. And being not a girl, a person in likeness, close in definition, to a man. Although much younger and shorter, hence a young man, though not quite the definition and much younger; it must be a ' BOY.' Not Father, but very close; just a boy, same sex but not a girl, a child. Not that a young girl, a child would be any better.
So all this being told, how does this visual information register in the brain of a young girl who's puberty is many years away, but is also absorbing vast amounts of bits of information, every second, minute, hour of the day and, yes even nights, breaking down visual, sounds, tastes and smells, all information being digested in her brain, thus mind, in approximation due survival in order for learning qualities and her own ' internal ' mental structure as to how society, thus world, works in order to function.
Had, she of seen it, it would of been at eye level. In her mind, how does she define ' BOY ' at EYE LEVEL ? In her mind, at age 14, 15, 16, 17, or even that ' SWEET SPOT,' in between 12 and 13, as understood by only lawyers as this pertains to international intellectual property laws due representation of youth as this ' SWEET SPOT,' and not limited ( in reality ) to any age under the age of 18? Lets go back to her current approximate age of about 5, 6 or even 7 and toss out the subconscious. Oh, sorry, left that out earlier. She was of the height of the displayed DVD's when I moved back to allow her passage, about the level of my belt, if I wore one, my crotch, from my perspective. Her eye level from her perspective, had she of looked. Now, is this just my observation alone as described and hopefully understood, or was this encounter with conscience just happen chance? Or the perspective of an adult who has some understanding of marketing. Sex sells; the training of the eye as it applies to the ' Desire line?' Who's the intended market? Has this application of ' ETHICS ' been distributed as such, in terms of intent, with this purpose in the rental and retail markets nationwide?
What of the implied ' BOY,' at eye level with the two adults, who needn't expression of enticement, represented as an ' equal ' in representation of product as defined in the presented lifestyle implied, and if to be rendered correct in society, and if so, determined in the mind of a child in the form of a little girl of 5 or 6 ? Later in life, what of a mother ( the little girl now mature ) of a little ' BOY,' how will he be taught to view life in the company of men as opposed to women, never mind the children when viewed from the perspective as an adult when he is mature, an adult?
The little girl who is now a mature woman, and of her memory as a child, when a penis is first seen in her life, what do you think was her ' first reaction,' the first ' image ' in her subconscious? Furthermore, what of the company of men on either side of the younger male in intended ' appearance ' in the center. To entice the observer. The implied ' BOY 'of her memory, forever imprinted and the image in her subconscious, of the DVD ' House Boy;' a memory retained as lesson by an observation of a young girl who was 5 or 6 years of age.
Who's perception will she SUBMIT, OR TOO, OR WHAT ? And how to approach the company of men in the work place as an Adult in the work place? How will her son or daughter, if raised only by her as a single parent? How will we as Adults, handle and display content not yet appropriate for children, most especially if a business, and most especially if they are NOT your children, is how we as Adults define ourselves as Adults in concern to OTHER ADULT'S CHILDREN.
The visual impact is that of enticement at center, satisfaction on either end and most importantly, the marketing of ' youth ' in a lifestyle that strongly suggests, if not a BANNER for the promotion and acceptance of PEDOPHILIA. The word ' BOY ' judges perception and begs question to the appearance of the model or actor in acceptance of his youthful expression as the acceptance of being in bed with two men, expressed as such as being proper and right, in light of a second or closer examination, that the model in the center is lightly bearded, and shaven as silhouette in order to fool the eye. Thus, a trick and an add for pedophilia. Enticement is the first objective of the pedophile in order to break the FIRST RULE OF THE PARENT, DON'T TALK TO STRANGERS ! FIRST RULE OF PARENTS, DON'T TALK TO STRANGERS !
And what of ' the little girl's ' point of view as an adult, memory, in the determination of a ' mate ' as parent in the mental process and the emotional makeup therein, and the ambition of motherhood? What values will be taught to ' boys ' and ' girls ' and of men and women , under the ' GUISE ' of EQUALITY and as to ' WHO ' will submit to WHOM AND AT WHAT AGE ? So, does this representation meet The Supreme Courts definition of educational or even the social content as it relates to redeeming value, as represented on the jacket of the DVD, with the appearance of a ' Young Boy ' as implicated ( Enticement ), in the the close ' sensual ' proximity of Adult Males in Embrace, in BED ? In my opinion, this ' advertisement ' of sexual content, in expression, of which, might in all probability, be recognized later in life as first expression; a process of enlisting ' new members ' in, or to the defense of a lifestyle and/or the engaging of sexual relationships with adults, as children, if seen, and have no prior knowledge of, as correct behavior. Furthermore, imprints the image as ' determined ' on the jacket, ' That's it's alright to sleep with ADULTS even as one male is not MOTHER and possibly, and the other is not even FATHER, and the ' appearance ' of EQUALITY as suggested in position, the linear placement of all models or actors on the same plane, as correct behavior and the ethical in appearance as practice.
The exception of placement of this product in the public eye is not only questioned in rational of what is deemed ' safe,' but also for the viewing of Adults who don't know any better than to just look. What damage as to ' acceptance of this image,' as a value to ethics, if allowed in rental and retail markets, to a public and even subculture, and or ' lifestyle,' who in turn, accept the ' practice ' of the implied ' EXHIBITION ' in representation in every day life as correct and well within there rights and what damage is done to the Rights of all concerned in the future and those in it, their offspring? Why was the voice of concern not heard in the ' GAY ' community as it has now been heard in society at large?
Subliminal Mind Control, and not very subliminal at that, or mindful of the rights of parent's children. If you only look, and then sometimes even by accident, they are seen, LURES OF PEDOPHILES. Because, if you don't raise your children with ethics as adults, as parents, then they are not yours.....to raise, and there's a whole world out there waiting to do so, with what ' it ' thinks ' it ' knows better.
No comments:
Post a Comment